<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sales Tax Support</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salestaxsupport.com/blogs/sales-use-tax/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salestaxsupport.com/blogs/sales-use-tax</link>
	<description>Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 17:31:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Sales Tax Audits: Actual Basis Approach Can Result in &#8220;Win-Win&#8221;.</title>
		<link>http://www.salestaxsupport.com/blogs/sales-use-tax/audits-and-sales-tax/sales-tax-audits-actual-basis-data-approach/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salestaxsupport.com/blogs/sales-use-tax/audits-and-sales-tax/sales-tax-audits-actual-basis-data-approach/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 19:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd Geggatt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audits and Sales Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Avalara]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lloyd Geggat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales tax audits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salestaxsupport.com/blogs/sales-use-tax/?p=1621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Before computers, most sales tax auditing involved the use of block samples to examine transactions. This involved looking at all the transactions within the same “blocks” of time (months, quarters) or accounts. With the onset of computer-aided sampling, more robust &#8230; <a href="http://www.salestaxsupport.com/blogs/sales-use-tax/audits-and-sales-tax/sales-tax-audits-actual-basis-data-approach/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salestaxsupport.com/blogs/sales-use-tax/audits-and-sales-tax/sales-tax-audits-actual-basis-data-approach/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Missouri &amp; Affiliate Nexus: MO Wants Piece of Click-Through Pie.</title>
		<link>http://www.salestaxsupport.com/blogs/sales-use-tax/sales-tax-nexus/missouri-affiliat-nexus-mo-wants-click-through-pie/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salestaxsupport.com/blogs/sales-use-tax/sales-tax-nexus/missouri-affiliat-nexus-mo-wants-click-through-pie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 19:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jerry Donnini</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sales Tax Nexus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salestaxsupport.com/blogs/sales-use-tax/?p=1618</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aside from the Marketplace Fairness Act of 2013, click through and affiliate nexus have dominated the sales tax billboards in 2013.  For the uninformed, click-through or affiliate nexus is another hook in which the state can attempt to force a &#8230; <a href="http://www.salestaxsupport.com/blogs/sales-use-tax/sales-tax-nexus/missouri-affiliat-nexus-mo-wants-click-through-pie/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salestaxsupport.com/blogs/sales-use-tax/sales-tax-nexus/missouri-affiliat-nexus-mo-wants-click-through-pie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marketplace Fairness: What Does It Mean For Exemption Certificates?</title>
		<link>http://www.salestaxsupport.com/blogs/sales-use-tax/sales-tax-exemption-certificate/marketplace-fairness-exemption-certificates/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salestaxsupport.com/blogs/sales-use-tax/sales-tax-exemption-certificate/marketplace-fairness-exemption-certificates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 21:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Silvia Aguirre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Exemption Certificate Mgmt.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exemption Certificate Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketplace Fairness Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales tax compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales Tax Exemption Certificate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salestaxsupport.com/blogs/sales-use-tax/?p=1574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On May 6, 2013, the Senate passed the Marketplace Fairness Act of 2013 with a vote of 69 to 27. MFA is heading to the House of Representatives and the collection of sales tax by out-of-state sellers is closer to &#8230; <a href="http://www.salestaxsupport.com/blogs/sales-use-tax/sales-tax-exemption-certificate/marketplace-fairness-exemption-certificates/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salestaxsupport.com/blogs/sales-use-tax/sales-tax-exemption-certificate/marketplace-fairness-exemption-certificates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marketplace Fairness Act: The Issues No One is Talking About</title>
		<link>http://www.salestaxsupport.com/blogs/sales-use-tax/internet-tax-ecommerce/the-marketplace-fairness-act-the-issues-no-one-is-talking-about/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salestaxsupport.com/blogs/sales-use-tax/internet-tax-ecommerce/the-marketplace-fairness-act-the-issues-no-one-is-talking-about/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 18:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sylvia F. Dion</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Tax / E-Commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Internet Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Remote Seller Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet sales tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Sales Tax Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketplace Fairness Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketplace Fairness Act of 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MFA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MFA 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Enzi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Seller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S. 764]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salestaxsupport.com/blogs/sales-use-tax/?p=1580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On May 6th, the U.S. Senate passed the Marketplace Fairness Act by a majority vote of 69 to 27.  Suddenly everyone is talking about the Marketplace Fairness Act since its passage means federal internet tax legislation could become final law. &#8230; <a href="http://www.salestaxsupport.com/blogs/sales-use-tax/internet-tax-ecommerce/the-marketplace-fairness-act-the-issues-no-one-is-talking-about/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salestaxsupport.com/blogs/sales-use-tax/internet-tax-ecommerce/the-marketplace-fairness-act-the-issues-no-one-is-talking-about/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New York Amazon Law Ruling: Website Nexus and Physical Presence</title>
		<link>http://www.salestaxsupport.com/blogs/sales-use-tax/sales-tax-nexus/new-york-amazon-law-website-nexus-and-physical-presence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salestaxsupport.com/blogs/sales-use-tax/sales-tax-nexus/new-york-amazon-law-website-nexus-and-physical-presence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 15:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jerry Donnini</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sales Tax Nexus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salestaxsupport.com/blogs/sales-use-tax/?p=1561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On March 28, 2013, a strong blow was delivered against the online retailers by New York’s highest court in Overstock &#38; Amazon v. New York State Department of Taxation and Finance.  The court ruled that section 1101, New York’s Tax &#8230; <a href="http://www.salestaxsupport.com/blogs/sales-use-tax/sales-tax-nexus/new-york-amazon-law-website-nexus-and-physical-presence/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salestaxsupport.com/blogs/sales-use-tax/sales-tax-nexus/new-york-amazon-law-website-nexus-and-physical-presence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marketplace Fairness Act 2013: What the Symbolic Vote Means</title>
		<link>http://www.salestaxsupport.com/blogs/sales-use-tax/internet-tax-ecommerce/marketplace-fairness-act-2013-symbolic-vote/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salestaxsupport.com/blogs/sales-use-tax/internet-tax-ecommerce/marketplace-fairness-act-2013-symbolic-vote/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Apr 2013 18:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sylvia F. Dion</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Tax / E-Commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR 684]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet sales tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Sales Tax Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kelly Ayotte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketplace Fairness Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Max Baucus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MFA 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S Amdt 576]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S. 336]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales tax systems]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salestaxsupport.com/blogs/sales-use-tax/?p=1533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are we closer than ever to seeing Federal Internet Sales Tax Legislation pass? Was the March 23rd Senate vote on the Marketplace Fairness Amendment to the Fiscal Year 2014 Congressional Budget Bill an indication that the time for Federal Internet &#8230; <a href="http://www.salestaxsupport.com/blogs/sales-use-tax/internet-tax-ecommerce/marketplace-fairness-act-2013-symbolic-vote/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salestaxsupport.com/blogs/sales-use-tax/internet-tax-ecommerce/marketplace-fairness-act-2013-symbolic-vote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Auditors Should Understand About Outsourced Sales Tax Returns</title>
		<link>http://www.salestaxsupport.com/blogs/sales-use-tax/audits-and-sales-tax/auditors-and-outsourced-sales-tax-returns/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salestaxsupport.com/blogs/sales-use-tax/audits-and-sales-tax/auditors-and-outsourced-sales-tax-returns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 20:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd Geggatt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audits and Sales Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Avalara]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lloyd Geggat]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salestaxsupport.com/blogs/sales-use-tax/?p=1526</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sales tax auditors are happiest when the amounts on sales tax returns reconcile exactly with the amounts in the taxpayer’s books and records. This allows them to accept the returns at face value and move on to other areas of &#8230; <a href="http://www.salestaxsupport.com/blogs/sales-use-tax/audits-and-sales-tax/auditors-and-outsourced-sales-tax-returns/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salestaxsupport.com/blogs/sales-use-tax/audits-and-sales-tax/auditors-and-outsourced-sales-tax-returns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sales Tax Automation: There’s No “Plug and Play” – Without People.</title>
		<link>http://www.salestaxsupport.com/blogs/sales-use-tax/sales-tax-software-automation/sales-tax-automation-theres-no-plug-and-play-without-people/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salestaxsupport.com/blogs/sales-use-tax/sales-tax-software-automation/sales-tax-automation-theres-no-plug-and-play-without-people/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 18:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patricia L. Pelino</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sales Tax Automation & Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salestaxsupport.com/blogs/sales-use-tax/?p=1516</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My name is Patricia Pelino and I worked for a leading sales tax software solution provider for over 20 years &#8211; as a tax research analyst, business analyst and finally a tax consultant. My goal is to open a dialogue regarding &#8230; <a href="http://www.salestaxsupport.com/blogs/sales-use-tax/sales-tax-software-automation/sales-tax-automation-theres-no-plug-and-play-without-people/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salestaxsupport.com/blogs/sales-use-tax/sales-tax-software-automation/sales-tax-automation-theres-no-plug-and-play-without-people/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can Sales Tax Exemptions Be Rationalized With 6 Policy Prerequisites?</title>
		<link>http://www.salestaxsupport.com/blogs/sales-use-tax/sales-tax-policy/exemptions-and-policy-prerequisites/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salestaxsupport.com/blogs/sales-use-tax/sales-tax-policy/exemptions-and-policy-prerequisites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 05:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Annette Nellen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sales Tax Policy - Tales & Trends]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salestaxsupport.com/blogs/sales-use-tax/?p=1493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I see that in late March, Utah added a 75th exemption to its list of sales tax exemptions. SB 250 allows a sales tax exemption for fuel cells beginning April 1, 2013. (Click here for SB 250 in pdf.) This &#8230; <a href="http://www.salestaxsupport.com/blogs/sales-use-tax/sales-tax-policy/exemptions-and-policy-prerequisites/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salestaxsupport.com/blogs/sales-use-tax/sales-tax-policy/exemptions-and-policy-prerequisites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Oregon Start Charging Sales Tax? If So &#8211; Are You Ready?</title>
		<link>http://www.salestaxsupport.com/blogs/sales-use-tax/sales-tax-exemption-certificate/oregon-sales-tax-ready-your-exemption-certificates/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salestaxsupport.com/blogs/sales-use-tax/sales-tax-exemption-certificate/oregon-sales-tax-ready-your-exemption-certificates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Apr 2013 20:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Silvia Aguirre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Exemption Certificate Mgmt.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exemption Certificate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exemption Certificate Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nexus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales Tax Exemption Certificate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salestaxsupport.com/blogs/sales-use-tax/?p=1444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are states that do not collect sales and use tax, and they are known as “Nomad States.”  The list includes:  New Hampshire, Oregon, Montana, Alaska and Delaware. Lately, there has been some buzz regarding Oregon being removed from that &#8230; <a href="http://www.salestaxsupport.com/blogs/sales-use-tax/sales-tax-exemption-certificate/oregon-sales-tax-ready-your-exemption-certificates/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salestaxsupport.com/blogs/sales-use-tax/sales-tax-exemption-certificate/oregon-sales-tax-ready-your-exemption-certificates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->